Superintelligence Europe — No. 007

Parliament bans nudifier AI 569–45. Amsterdam court hits xAI with €100K daily fines. Zagreb gets Europe's first robotaxi. Your Friday briefing.

In partnership with

Superintelligence Europe — Briefing No. 007 — Friday, 27 March 2026
Superintelligence
Europe Daily Briefing
No. 007
Friday, 27 March 2026
06:00 CET
Everything that moved in European AI on Thursday 26 March  ·  Across all 27 EU member states
569
MEPs voted for the Digital Omnibus nudifier ban
€100K
daily fine on xAI/Grok per Amsterdam court
1st
commercial robotaxi service launched in Europe
2027
new deadline for high-risk AI system rules
Issue No. 007 — Friday, 27 March 2026

Thursday was one of the most consequential single days in European AI since we started this briefing. Three events happened simultaneously that will shape how AI is governed, deployed, and contested on this continent for years. The European Parliament voted 569 to 45 to ban nudifier AI apps — the most decisive legislative action on AI-generated harm the Parliament has ever taken. The Amsterdam District Court handed xAI and Grok a binding injunction with €100,000 daily fines — Europe’s first judicial order of its kind against an AI image generator. And in Zagreb, Uber, Pony.ai, and Verne announced Europe’s first commercial robotaxi service, with testing already underway on public roads.

Legislation, litigation, and deployment all moved on the same Thursday. This is what European AI looks like when it accelerates. Five stories. Your Friday morning briefing starts here.

Thursday’s Briefing
01EU: Parliament bans nudifier AI apps — 569 to 45
02NL: Amsterdam court orders xAI/Grok to stop — €100K/day
03HR: Zagreb gets Europe’s first commercial robotaxi
 
04EU: Data centres vs. power grids — Politico maps the collision
05Signal — voices shaping Thursday
Lead · EU-wide · Legislation / AI Act
01
The European Parliament voted 569 to 45 to ban AI nudifier apps — the most decisive legislative action on AI-generated harm the Parliament has ever taken

The European Parliament passed its plenary position on the Digital Omnibus amendment to the AI Act by 569 votes in favour, 45 against, and 23 abstentions — an unusually large margin for a piece of legislation touching both civil liberties and business competitiveness. The position now opens trilogue negotiations with the Council of the EU, with a final compromise expected as early as April.

The headline provision: a new outright prohibition on AI “nudifier” systems — tools that create or manipulate images to depict identifiable real people in sexually explicit or intimate ways without their consent. The ban was not in the Commission’s original proposal; it was pushed by Parliament, led by co-rapporteur Michael McNamara (Renew, Ireland). The vote came the same day that the Amsterdam court ruled against Grok — a convergence that made the political symbolism impossible to miss. Beyond the ban, Parliament also voted to push the application deadline for most high-risk AI systems to December 2, 2027, giving companies and national authorities more time to prepare for obligations that were already running behind schedule. SME flexibility provisions and data bias correction safeguards were also included.

What This Means in Practice

Once the trilogue reaches agreement and the measure enters into force — expected this summer — any AI system that allows non-consensual sexualised image generation without effective safeguards will be prohibited across the EU. Platforms found to be hosting such tools will face fines calculated as a percentage of global turnover. The ban applies not just to dedicated nudifier apps but to any AI system capable of producing such content. As McNamara noted, almost all major AI models have already chosen not to enable this. The target is the minority that have not.

The Broader AI Act Package

Thursday’s vote is the Parliament’s first formal mandate for trilogue. The Council approved its own position on 13 March 2026. Both sides now enter negotiations. The December 2027 high-risk deadline extension, the SME provisions, and the nudifier ban are the three pressure points most likely to define the final text. Watch for movement within weeks.

Landmark Ruling · Netherlands · AI Liability
02
Amsterdam court orders xAI and Grok to stop generating non-consensual sexual images — Europe’s first binding AI injunction of its kind
Sources: Reuters · TechPolicy.Press · Al Jazeera · 26 March 2026

The Amsterdam District Court issued a preliminary injunction on Thursday prohibiting xAI and its Grok chatbot from generating or distributing sexual imagery of persons partially or wholly stripped naked without their explicit consent anywhere in the Netherlands. Non-compliance carries fines of €100,000 per day per defendant. The court also ordered that Grok cannot be offered on the X platform while in breach of the ruling. The case was brought by Offlimits, a Dutch nonprofit focused on combating online sexual abuse, working with the Victims Support Fund.

xAI had argued at the March 12 hearing that it had implemented stringent safeguards since January 20, 2026 and that guaranteeing zero misuse was technically impossible. The court found that argument directly undermined by Offlimits’ evidence: on March 9 — the same day xAI sent its categorical denial to Offlimits — Offlimits was still able to generate a sexualised video of an existing person from a single uploaded photograph using Grok, without any consent verification. The court ruled that as an internet intermediary with control over Grok’s functionalities, xAI bears responsibility for preventing the generation of unlawful images — regardless of whether individual users issue the prompts.

Why This Ruling Is Different

Previous European regulatory actions against AI misuse have been investigations or warnings. This is a binding court order with daily financial penalties — the first of its kind in Europe against an AI image generator. The court explicitly rejected the “we cannot control our users” defence. That precedent, if upheld, fundamentally shifts where liability sits in European AI law: from user to platform. Ireland’s Data Protection Commission has a parallel GDPR investigation open. The European Commission is also examining the case under the Digital Services Act. Thursday’s ruling is the sharpest point yet of a much larger enforcement wave.

Deployment · Croatia · Autonomous Mobility
03
Zagreb will be the first city in Europe with a commercial robotaxi service — Uber, Pony.ai, and Verne announce the partnership
Sources: Official press release · TechCrunch · Euronews · 26 March 2026

Verne, Pony.ai, and Uber announced on Thursday a three-way partnership to launch Europe’s first commercial robotaxi service, starting in Zagreb, Croatia. Public road testing using Pony.ai’s Gen-7 autonomous driving system, deployed on the Arcfox Alpha T5 robotaxi platform, is already underway. Fare-charging services are in preparation. Uber will invest directly in Verne as a strategic partner and integrate the service into its global ride-hailing network, alongside Verne’s own app.

Verne is a Croatian startup backed by Rimac Group — the company whose founder Mate Rimac has spent seven years working toward exactly this moment. Pony.ai brings proven commercial-scale autonomous driving technology from China, where it has already reached unit economics breakeven in Guangzhou and Shenzhen. The partnership structure is deliberate: Pony.ai provides the technology, Verne owns and operates the fleet, and Uber provides distribution at scale. Verne will also be responsible for obtaining European regulatory approval and coordinating cross-market expansion — with plans to grow to thousands of robotaxis over the next few years.

Why Zagreb — and Why Now

Zagreb is home to Rimac Group — which gives Verne an established industrial and regulatory footprint. Croatia’s relatively compact urban geography and its status as a smaller EU market makes it an effective testbed for European regulatory approval before expansion. The timing is also significant: Chinese autonomous driving companies face tightening restrictions in the US market, accelerating their pivot to Europe. Pony.ai previously partnered with Estonian app Bolt for European AV deployment. The Zagreb announcement marks a step-change in scale and ambition.

Infrastructure · EU-wide · Energy & Sovereignty
04
Europe’s AI data centre ambitions are colliding with power grids, energy costs — and local resistance
Source: Politico Europe · 26 March 2026

Politico published a detailed infrastructure analysis on Thursday documenting the growing gap between the EU’s stated ambition — thousands of new AI data centres under the AI Continent Action Plan and InvestAI programme — and the physical reality of where those facilities can actually be built and powered. Grid capacity constraints, high European energy costs, and increasingly vocal local resistance are combining to create a practical ceiling on how quickly the EU can build the sovereign compute infrastructure its AI strategy depends on.

The piece builds on the broader picture established by Wired’s grid investigation earlier this week — but adds the dimension of public opposition, which is emerging as a factor in planning decisions across multiple member states. Data centres are large, energy-intensive, water-cooled facilities. In communities where energy costs are already a political pressure point, their arrival is not always welcome. The collision between Brussels’ sovereignty rhetoric and local planning realities is the infrastructure story beneath the infrastructure story.

05 · Signal — Verified Voices

Credible accounts and publications that drove Thursday’s European AI conversation. Filtered for genuine signal.

@Europarl_EN
European Parliament

The official Parliament account’s post announcing the 569–45 vote was the most-amplified EU institutional post on AI in weeks. The vote margin — nearly ten to one — was the story within the story, signalling a level of cross-party consensus that is rare in EU digital legislation.

@Offlimits_nl
Dutch nonprofit · Netherlands

The organisation that brought the case against xAI. Offlimits’ director Robbert Hoving was the most-cited voice in the Reuters and Al Jazeera coverage. His framing — “the burden is on the company” — is the sentence that will be cited in every subsequent European AI liability discussion.

@Uber / @Verne_auto
Uber & Verne · Croatia / Global

The joint press release landed simultaneously on Bloomberg, TechCrunch, Euronews, and Automotive News within hours of publication. The Verne CEO quote — “Europe needs autonomous mobility that can move from testing to a real service” — captured the week’s deployment mood precisely. Mate Rimac’s personal amplification on LinkedIn added significant reach in European tech circles.

The AI your stack deployed is losing customers.

You shipped it. It works. Tickets are resolving. So why are customers leaving?

Gladly's 2026 Customer Expectations Report uncovered a gap that most CIOs don't see until it's too late: 88% of customers get their issues resolved through AI — but only 22% prefer that company afterward. Resolution without loyalty is just churn on a delay.

The difference isn't the model. It's the architecture. How AI is integrated into the customer journey, what it hands off and when, and whether the system is designed to build relationships or just close tickets.

Download the report to see what consumers actually expect from AI-powered service — and what the data says about the platforms getting it right.

If you're responsible for the infrastructure, you're responsible for the outcome.